Comments on: PyGObject Hackfest Report http://laszlopandy.com/2011/02/03/pygobject-hackfest-report/ Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:23:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: John Stowershttp://laszlopandy.com/2011/02/03/pygobject-hackfest-report/comment-page-1/#comment-88 John Stowers Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:10:07 +0000 http://laszlopandy.com/?p=103#comment-88 Thanks, the correction explains the situation perfectly now.Good to hear PyGObject is getting near ready for large projects! Thanks, the correction explains the situation perfectly now.

Good to hear PyGObject is getting near ready for large projects!

]]>
By: laszlohttp://laszlopandy.com/2011/02/03/pygobject-hackfest-report/comment-page-1/#comment-87 laszlo Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:58:14 +0000 http://laszlopandy.com/?p=103#comment-87 Thanks for the clarification John. I've fixed the text. Thanks for the clarification John. I’ve fixed the text.

]]>
By: John Stowershttp://laszlopandy.com/2011/02/03/pygobject-hackfest-report/comment-page-1/#comment-86 John Stowers Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:22:35 +0000 http://laszlopandy.com/?p=103#comment-86 Just a clarification; PyGtk is not going to "drop the static bindings". We will continue to support and make bug fix releases against gtk+-2.24 Just a clarification; PyGtk is not going to “drop the static bindings”. We will continue to support and make bug fix releases against gtk+-2.24

]]>