Comments on: PyGObject Hackfest Report http://laszlopandy.com/2011/02/03/pygobject-hackfest-report/ Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:23:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.7 By: John Stowershttp://laszlopandy.com/2011/02/03/pygobject-hackfest-report/comment-page-1/#comment-88 Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:10:07 +0000 http://laszlopandy.com/?p=103#comment-88 Thanks, the correction explains the situation perfectly now.

Good to hear PyGObject is getting near ready for large projects!

]]> By: laszlohttp://laszlopandy.com/2011/02/03/pygobject-hackfest-report/comment-page-1/#comment-87 Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:58:14 +0000 http://laszlopandy.com/?p=103#comment-87 Thanks for the clarification John. I’ve fixed the text.

]]> By: John Stowershttp://laszlopandy.com/2011/02/03/pygobject-hackfest-report/comment-page-1/#comment-86 Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:22:35 +0000 http://laszlopandy.com/?p=103#comment-86 Just a clarification; PyGtk is not going to “drop the static bindings”. We will continue to support and make bug fix releases against gtk+-2.24

]]>